In 1969, Armstrong reportedly said, "That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind"--which, grammatically speaking, is the same thing as saying,"That’s one small step for mankind, one giant leap for mankind." Armstrong always has maintained that he had included a missing "A"--for a man.
According to The New York Times, "Mr. Ford said he downloaded the audio recording from a NASA Web site and analyzed it with software that allows disabled people to communicate through computers using nerve impulses. In a graphical representation of the famous phrase, Mr. Ford said he found evidence that the missing 'a' was spoken and transmitted to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration."
2 comments:
Peter Shann Ford's "analysis" of Neil Armstrong's moon landing speech is completely unscientific, and not a proof at all. (1). No speech researcher would make a scientific claim using Goldwave software (like making a blockbuster movie in iMovie). (2). The audio used was 11.025 kHz, 8 bit quality. (3). The "control phrase" (for mankind) has shorter syllables because it has more of them. (4). Peter Shann Ford didn't use the first tool of any speech researcher - the spectrogram. (5). Peter's "research" was reviewed by an astronaut who emphasised the finding was "persuasive", and "Ms. Rano Singh, a Physiotherapist with a Masters in Biomechanics". (6). The mouth diagram is from a description of Korean alveolars, and Korean does not have the American English approximant /r/. (this point from here
and here .(7). There was no peer review by real speech analysis researchers. I believe the whole thing to be a dodgy publicity stunt for Peter Shann Ford and his Control Bionics company. Read more: here
Well, being from Wapakoneta, Ohio, if Neil said he said "it," I believe it.
Post a Comment